Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 50 Clinics in the Marshfield Clinic health system


The results below represent 28,242 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
Arcadia Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Athens Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Bloomer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Cadott Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Chetek Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Chippewa Falls Center
N=489
80.16 %
View Historical Data
Clairemont Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Colby-Abbotsford Center
N=367
80.38 %
View Historical Data
Cornell Center
N=139
84.17 %
View Historical Data
Cumberland Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eagle River Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eau Claire Center
N=863
79.03 %
View Historical Data
Eau Claire South Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Elk Mound Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Greenwood Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Hayward Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Ladysmith Center
N=457
82.93 %
View Historical Data
Lake Hallie Center
N=371
71.97 %
View Historical Data
Lakewoods Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Center
N=2995
75.79 %
View Historical Data
MARSHFIELD CLINIC
N=14786
78.61 %
View Historical Data
Marshfield Clinic at Howard Young Medical

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic at James Beck Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care at St Michaels

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Menomonie Center
N=150
84.00 %
View Historical Data
Mercer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Merrill Center
N=696
82.18 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Center
N=1207
80.28 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Counseling Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Mosinee Center
N=268
75.75 %
View Historical Data
Oakwood Center
N=423
81.32 %
View Historical Data
Osseo Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Park Falls Center
N=533
80.11 %
View Historical Data
Phillips Center
N=125
81.60 %
View Historical Data
Professional Plaza

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Regional Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Rice Lake Center
N=1632
77.51 %
View Historical Data
Riverview Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Stettin Center
N=534
82.96 %
View Historical Data
Stevens Point Center
N=154
77.27 %
View Historical Data
Stratford Center
N=172
82.56 %
View Historical Data
Wausau Center
N=771
84.18 %
View Historical Data
Wausau Oral Surgery

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Weston Center
N=693
82.40 %
View Historical Data
Weston Oral Surgery Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wisconsin Rapids Center
N=417
77.94 %
View Historical Data
Wisconsin Rapids Orthopedics Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wittenberg Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Woodruff Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Process measure contains two goals. Both goals within the measure must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure.

Diabetes optimal testing includes:

  • Two A1C tests performed during the 12 month reporting period -- And
  • One kidney function test during the 12 month reporting period, and/or diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the provider.

For the Patient: The American Diabetes Association recommends these two tests to prevent and reduce diabetes complications such as blindness, loss of limb and kidney disease. Both tests should be performed and the test results will help your doctor decide the best diabetes care for you. The All-or-None measure can be used to see how well diabetes care is done where you receive your care.

For the Provider: This method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patients entire healthcare experience. In addition, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.