Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 66 Clinics in the UW Health health system


The results below represent 12,453 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ACHC ERDMAN FAM MED
N=354
71.47 %
View Historical Data
ACHC SOUTHSIDE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA FAMILY MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH FAM MED CENTER
N=431
55.92 %
View Historical Data
ACHC WTE MEDICAL
N=268
66.04 %
View Historical Data
AUGUSTA FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BEAVER DAM FAM MED
N=561
76.65 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM INT MED
N=299
80.27 %
View Historical Data
BELLEVILLE FAM MED
N=262
76.72 %
View Historical Data
COLUMBUS FAM MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COTTAGE GROVE MAIN FAM MED
N=179
79.89 %
View Historical Data
CROSS PLAINS FAM MED
N=214
70.09 %
View Historical Data
DEFOREST WINDSOR FAM MED
N=549
73.59 %
View Historical Data
DEPARTMENT_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC INT MED
N=652
78.83 %
View Historical Data
EAST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAU CLAIRE FAM MED
N=121
66.12 %
View Historical Data
EMPLOYER SERVICES DEFOREST SCHOOL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG FAM MED
N=155
78.06 %
View Historical Data
FITCHBURG PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FORT ATKINSON MEHTA FAM MED
N=483
77.64 %
View Historical Data
MERITER MATERNAL FETAL MED PSYCHOLOGY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MOUNT HOREB FAM MED
N=189
66.14 %
View Historical Data
NORTHEAST FAM MED
N=602
68.94 %
View Historical Data
OAKWOOD WEST GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ODANA ATRIUM FAM MED
N=680
68.68 %
View Historical Data
ODANA ATRIUM INT MED
N=121
73.55 %
View Historical Data
OLD_COTTAGE GROVE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_FORT ATKINSON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OREGON FAM MED
N=290
64.83 %
View Historical Data
PORTAGE FAM MED
N=306
73.53 %
View Historical Data
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM FAM MED
N=162
54.32 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD INT MED
N=171
78.36 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUN PRAIRIE WINDSOR FAM MED
N=539
75.32 %
View Historical Data
TAC PEDS FITNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 4TH FLOOR
N=448
70.76 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 5TH FLOOR
N=361
72.30 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WELCOME CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WOMANCARE GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS INT MED
N=601
76.37 %
UNION CORNERS OB GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION INT MED
N=427
75.18 %
View Historical Data
UNIV STATION PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION PEDS ADOLESCENT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VERONA FAM MED
N=476
81.09 %
View Historical Data
Wchq_Metric_id

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED AB
N=624
71.96 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD
N=461
72.23 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED WMNS HEALTH
N=353
80.74 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST TOWNE INT MED
N=478
86.61 %
View Historical Data
WEST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
YAHARA FAM MED
N=636
76.42 %
View Historical Data

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Process measure contains two goals. Both goals within the measure must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure.

Diabetes optimal testing includes:

  • Two A1C tests performed during the 12 month reporting period -- And
  • One kidney function test during the 12 month reporting period, and/or diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the provider.

For the Patient: The American Diabetes Association recommends these two tests to prevent and reduce diabetes complications such as blindness, loss of limb and kidney disease. Both tests should be performed and the test results will help your doctor decide the best diabetes care for you. The All-or-None measure can be used to see how well diabetes care is done where you receive your care.

For the Provider: This method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patients entire healthcare experience. In addition, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.