Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Diabetes: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 57 Clinics in the Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare health system


The results below represent 13,067 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has five goals. All five goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AS Gateway-Kenosha

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SJ FL5 Women Outpatient Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG 1320 WI AVE FL 1 N
N=654
21.25 %
View Historical Data
WFMG 2500 LAYTON 220

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS 3807 FAM
N=1121
27.12 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS 3807 INT
N=1622
49.57 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS 3807 PED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS CVI 410

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS ENDO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS MT PLEASANT
N=625
36.00 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS POB A 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS RACINE INSINKERATOR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS SLHP FL1

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS Sturtevant
N=442
31.22 %
View Historical Data
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL
N=648
47.07 %
View Historical Data
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL WWOOD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG BROWN DEER
N=901
39.62 %
View Historical Data
WFMG CUDAHY
N=276
39.49 %
View Historical Data
WFMG EM MOB 400

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 104W

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 200E
N=541
42.88 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FOUR MILE
N=743
40.24 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FRK MOB FL 2
N=860
41.86 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FRK MOB FL 3

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG GLENDALE OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG METRO MAP 114

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2500 LAYTON 10
N=314
41.72 %
View Historical Data
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 201

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 206

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 4600 LOOMIS 130
N=557
39.68 %
View Historical Data
WFMG MP CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP NEW BERLIN 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP RAWSON G30

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP S 16TH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 100
N=346
41.33 %
View Historical Data
WFMG MP SF MAP 122

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 124

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF OHIO 103

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG NEW BERLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG ONE MAIN
N=517
39.26 %
View Historical Data
WFMG ORCHARD ST

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG PEWAUKEE
N=147
49.66 %
View Historical Data
WFMG RAWSON 143

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG RAWSON G30
N=374
43.05 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SF EUCLID 1000
N=302
39.07 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SF MAP 102 CRDEP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SF MAP 105 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ FL 7W
N=265
24.15 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SJ POB 106

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ POB FL 6
N=412
30.58 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SUSSEX
N=328
24.39 %
View Historical Data
WFMG TOSA FL 2
N=857
38.74 %
View Historical Data
WFMG TOSA FL 2 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA FL 3 OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA N 117TH 200

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG UNION GROVE
N=215
29.77 %
View Historical Data

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Measures are two separate measures, one for process (optimal testing) and one for outcomes (optimal results). This measure contains five goals. All five goals within the measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator of each all-or-none measure is collected from the organization's total diabetes denominator.

Using the diabetes denominator optimal results includes:

  • Most recent A1C test result is less than 8.0% -- And
  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Tobacco Non-User -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet for Diabetes Patients with Ischemic Vascular Disease Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use for patients ages 40 through 75 or patients with IVD of any age

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.

Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.