Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Diabetes: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 147 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 43,331 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has five goals. All five goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=505
50.50 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=828
48.07 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=523
45.51 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=397
45.09 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=293
37.20 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=2372
46.80 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=795
41.89 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=287
42.16 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=1021
43.58 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=1439
44.68 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=464
45.91 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=1165
48.58 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=770
38.18 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=295
48.47 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=394
52.28 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - SLINGER
N=358
48.32 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=210
46.19 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=263
39.92 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=323
45.20 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=424
44.81 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=826
46.00 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=784
40.56 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=307
50.81 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=393
37.66 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=262
46.95 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=677
53.03 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=879
49.94 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE
N=279
46.59 %
View Historical Data
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=2038
44.31 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET
N=337
41.54 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=1006
48.01 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH
N=226
57.52 %
View Historical Data
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO
N=149
48.32 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=881
46.99 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=1241
45.12 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO
N=152
34.21 %
View Historical Data
AHC SUAMICO
N=300
45.00 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=704
55.68 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=526
48.67 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=344
40.70 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=673
46.36 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=548
49.45 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY
N=309
43.69 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=665
36.99 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=735
45.71 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=307
47.88 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=803
53.18 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=1470
44.63 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=969
53.25 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=355
46.48 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=895
43.46 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH
N=189
48.68 %
View Historical Data
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=1413
43.88 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=333
39.64 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=226
51.77 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES
N=268
33.96 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=858
43.12 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY
N=185
48.65 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=317
49.84 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT
N=291
34.36 %
View Historical Data
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=1711
45.47 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC
N=320
40.94 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=835
45.87 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=504
49.80 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=844
42.77 %
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY CARE CENTER
N=324
36.11 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=613
42.74 %
View Historical Data
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=715
32.45 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=219
39.73 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Measures are two separate measures, one for process (optimal testing) and one for outcomes (optimal results). This measure contains five goals. All five goals within the measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator of each all-or-none measure is collected from the organization's total diabetes denominator.

Using the diabetes denominator optimal results includes:

  • Most recent A1C test result is less than 8.0% -- And
  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Tobacco Non-User -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet for Diabetes Patients with Ischemic Vascular Disease Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use for patients ages 40 through 75 or patients with IVD of any age

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.

Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.