Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Diabetes: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 26 Clinics in the Aspirus health system


The results below represent 7,055 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has five goals. All five goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ASPIRUS ANTIGO CLINIC
N=1055
56.87 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS DOCTORS CLINIC
N=1398
46.14 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS GILMAN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS KRONENWETTER CLINIC
N=502
51.79 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS LAND O LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-BIRNAMWOOD CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-ELCHO CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS MEDFORD CLINIC
N=773
42.43 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS PEDIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PHILLIPS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PRENTICE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS RHINELANDER CLINIC
N=263
50.57 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS RIB LAKE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS THREE LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL EDGAR CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY HEALTH SPECIALISTS
N=580
56.03 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC
N=245
31.43 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY PHYSICIANS
N=598
57.53 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MARATHON CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MERRILL CLINIC
N=258
44.19 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL STEVENS POINT CLINIC
N=495
45.25 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL WESTHILL MEDICAL SPECIALISTS
N=450
54.67 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WESTON CLINIC
N=438
54.11 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WITTENBERG CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WOODRUFF CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Test Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Measures are two separate measures, one for process (optimal testing) and one for outcomes (optimal results). This measure contains five goals. All five goals within the measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator of each all-or-none measure is collected from the organization's total diabetes denominator.

Using the diabetes denominator optimal results includes:

  • Most recent A1C test result is less than 8.0% -- And
  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Tobacco Non-User -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet for Diabetes Patients with Ischemic Vascular Disease Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use for patients ages 40 through 75 or patients with IVD of any age

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.

Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.