Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 29 Clinics in the Bellin Health health system


The results below represent 2,879 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ALGOMA NURSING HOME PROGRAM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH CRIVITZ

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH DAGGETT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC ALGOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC ASHWAUBENON
N=625
67.36 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC ASHWAUBENON IM AND PEDIATRICS
N=197
59.90 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC BELLEVUE
N=270
60.37 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC BRILLION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC DE PERE EAST
N=282
67.73 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC DE PERE WEST
N=138
65.94 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC ESCANABA
N=162
68.52 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC HOWARD
N=261
61.69 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC IRON MOUNTAIN
N=340
70.00 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC KEWAUNEE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC LUXEMBURG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC MANITOWOC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC OCONTO FALLS
N=130
61.54 %
BELLIN HEALTH FMC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC SURING

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC WEBSTER AVE AND CLINICA HISPANA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH FMC WRIGHTSTOWN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH MARINETTE
N=474
58.02 %
BELLIN HEALTH MENOMINEE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH PESHTIGO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BELLIN HEALTH STURGEON BAY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.