Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 25 Clinics in the SSM Health Dean Medical Group health system


The results below represent 4,515 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Baraboo
N=500
67.80 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Barneveld

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Beaver Dam
N=232
71.12 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Columbus

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Deerfield

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Delavan

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Dodgeville

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Edgerton

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Evansville

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Fish Hatchery Rd, Madison
N=471
75.80 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Fort Atkinson
N=141
66.67 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Janesville
N=710
70.28 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Lake Delton

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Mineral Point

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - N. High Point Rd, Madison
N=461
76.14 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Oregon
N=143
76.22 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Portage
N=214
69.16 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - S. Stoughton Rd, Madison
N=846
70.21 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Stoughton
N=201
70.15 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Sun Prairie
N=380
72.37 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Waterloo

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Waunakee
N=111
79.28 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Whitewater
N=105
75.24 %
SSM Health Dean Medical Group - Wisconsin Dells

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SSM Health Outpatient Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.