Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 66 Clinics in the UW Health health system


The results below represent 3,057 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ACHC ERDMAN FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC SOUTHSIDE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA FAMILY MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH FAM MED CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WTE MEDICAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AUGUSTA FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BEAVER DAM FAM MED
N=240
58.75 %
BEAVER DAM INT MED
N=176
56.25 %
BELLEVILLE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COTTAGE GROVE MAIN FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CROSS PLAINS FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
DEFOREST WINDSOR FAM MED
N=186
67.74 %
DEPARTMENT_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC INT MED
N=168
66.67 %
EAST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAU CLAIRE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EMPLOYER SERVICES DEFOREST SCHOOL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FORT ATKINSON MEHTA FAM MED
N=159
67.30 %
MERITER MATERNAL FETAL MED PSYCHOLOGY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MOUNT HOREB FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NORTHEAST FAM MED
N=163
61.35 %
OAKWOOD WEST GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ODANA ATRIUM FAM MED
N=146
56.16 %
ODANA ATRIUM INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_COTTAGE GROVE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_FORT ATKINSON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OREGON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PORTAGE FAM MED
N=120
57.50 %
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUN PRAIRIE WINDSOR FAM MED
N=133
62.41 %
TAC PEDS FITNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 4TH FLOOR
N=164
64.02 %
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 5TH FLOOR
N=113
62.83 %
TWENTY S PARK MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WELCOME CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WOMANCARE GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS INT MED
N=210
59.52 %
UNION CORNERS OB GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION INT MED
N=178
70.79 %
UNIV STATION PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION PEDS ADOLESCENT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VERONA FAM MED
N=130
68.46 %
Wchq_Metric_id

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED AB
N=230
64.78 %
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD
N=188
60.64 %
WEST CLINIC INT MED WMNS HEALTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST TOWNE INT MED
N=164
72.56 %
WEST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
YAHARA FAM MED
N=189
58.20 %


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.