Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 57 Clinics in the Ascension | Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare health system


The results below represent 3,984 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AS Gateway-Kenosha

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SJ FL5 Women Outpatient Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG 1320 WI AVE FL 1 N
N=127
38.58 %
WFMG 2500 LAYTON 220

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS 3807 FAM
N=292
43.49 %
WFMG AS 3807 INT
N=536
62.31 %
WFMG AS 3807 PED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS CVI 410

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS ENDO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS MT PLEASANT
N=147
48.98 %
WFMG AS POB A 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS RACINE INSINKERATOR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS SLHP FL1

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS Sturtevant
N=108
48.15 %
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL
N=340
56.18 %
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL WWOOD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG BROWN DEER
N=128
52.34 %
WFMG CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EM MOB 400

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 104W

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 200E
N=245
55.51 %
WFMG FOUR MILE
N=245
55.92 %
WFMG FRK MOB FL 2
N=342
58.19 %
WFMG FRK MOB FL 3

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG GLENDALE OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG METRO MAP 114

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2500 LAYTON 10

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 201

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 206

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 4600 LOOMIS 130
N=274
61.68 %
WFMG MP CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP NEW BERLIN 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP RAWSON G30

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP S 16TH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 100
N=118
56.78 %
WFMG MP SF MAP 122

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 124

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF OHIO 103

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG NEW BERLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG ONE MAIN
N=211
56.87 %
WFMG ORCHARD ST

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG PEWAUKEE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG RAWSON 143

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG RAWSON G30
N=103
60.19 %
WFMG SF EUCLID 1000
N=115
48.70 %
WFMG SF MAP 102 CRDEP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SF MAP 105 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ FL 7W

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ POB 106

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ POB FL 6
N=106
37.74 %
WFMG SUSSEX
N=134
53.73 %
WFMG TOSA FL 2
N=312
53.85 %
WFMG TOSA FL 2 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA FL 3 OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA N 117TH 200

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG UNION GROVE
N=101
58.42 %


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.