Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 147 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 16,866 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=135
75.56 %
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=324
66.05 %
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=175
66.29 %
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=272
67.65 %
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=141
63.12 %
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=629
67.25 %
AAH - HARTFORD
N=450
62.22 %
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=126
74.60 %
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=422
69.43 %
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=680
66.76 %
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=110
66.36 %
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=364
70.05 %
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=161
61.49 %
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=136
61.76 %
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=215
70.70 %
AAH - RIDGEFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - SLINGER
N=221
62.44 %
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=308
67.53 %
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=110
65.45 %
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=104
64.42 %
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=132
71.21 %
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=278
61.15 %
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=279
66.67 %
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=123
69.11 %
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=154
59.09 %
AHC DELAVAN
N=147
65.31 %
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=249
67.07 %
AHC EDGERTON
N=406
68.72 %
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=741
61.40 %
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=585
67.35 %
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=326
65.64 %
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=424
62.26 %
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SUAMICO
N=124
65.32 %
AHC TOWER COURT
N=270
76.30 %
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=370
67.84 %
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=118
67.80 %
AHC WAUKESHA
N=318
70.13 %
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=192
73.96 %
AMG DOOR COUNTY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=179
58.66 %
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=350
67.14 %
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=153
66.01 %
AMG OSHKOSH
N=393
68.70 %
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=708
61.44 %
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=502
69.32 %
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=141
59.57 %
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=438
64.84 %
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=669
61.58 %
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=248
63.31 %
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=123
53.66 %
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=342
59.65 %
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=121
58.68 %
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=633
64.30 %
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=467
68.09 %
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=224
68.75 %
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=372
61.56 %
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=202
56.44 %
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=170
41.76 %
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=112
67.86 %
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.