Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 26 Clinics in the Aspirus health system


The results below represent 2,841 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ASPIRUS ANTIGO CLINIC
N=463
73.87 %
ASPIRUS DOCTORS CLINIC
N=575
68.17 %
ASPIRUS GILMAN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS KRONENWETTER CLINIC
N=151
73.51 %
ASPIRUS LAND O LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-BIRNAMWOOD CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-ELCHO CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS MEDFORD CLINIC
N=305
61.31 %
ASPIRUS PEDIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PHILLIPS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PRENTICE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS RHINELANDER CLINIC
N=130
70.77 %
ASPIRUS RIB LAKE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS THREE LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL EDGAR CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY HEALTH SPECIALISTS
N=230
72.17 %
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY PHYSICIANS
N=250
73.20 %
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MARATHON CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MERRILL CLINIC
N=122
63.93 %
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL STEVENS POINT CLINIC
N=177
69.49 %
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL WESTHILL MEDICAL SPECIALISTS
N=322
75.47 %
ASPIRUS WESTON CLINIC
N=116
66.38 %
ASPIRUS WITTENBERG CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WOODRUFF CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Test Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.