Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 38 Clinics in the Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin health system


The results below represent 3,506 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
CITY OF MILWAUKEE WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FH - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CALHOUN HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CENTRAL WAUKESHA HEALTH CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - FROEDTERT HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Germantown Health Center
N=144
63.89 %
FMCW - Greendale Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Greenfield Highlands Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Hartford Health Center
N=103
64.08 %
FMCW - Internal Medicine - Froedtert Specialty Clinics Building
N=383
50.39 %
FMCW - Jackson Health Center
N=138
71.74 %
FMCW - Kewaskum Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Lincoln Avenue Health Center
N=254
61.42 %
FMCW - Moorland Reserve Health Center
N=151
72.85 %
FMCW - North Hills Health Center
N=114
61.40 %
FMCW - Oconomowoc Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Plank Road Health Center
N=280
60.00 %
FMCW - Sargeant Health Center
N=612
62.09 %
FMCW - Springdale Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - St Joseph Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - St. Joseph's Hospital

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Sunnyslope Health Center
N=106
58.49 %
FMCW - Sussex Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Town Hall Health Center
N=599
68.45 %
FMCW - West Bend Health Center
N=622
70.58 %
FMCW - Westbrook Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
HATCO WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MCW - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC CMH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC FEC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC SJH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PALERMO'S WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.