Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 50 Clinics in the Marshfield Clinic health system


The results below represent 82,804 women who should have had one or more cervical cancer screening tests during the previous 36 months or one cervical cancer screening test and a human papillomavirus test within the last 5 years. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
Arcadia Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Athens Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Bloomer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Cadott Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Chetek Center
N=428
64.72 %
View Historical Data
Chippewa Falls Center
N=1788
79.53 %
View Historical Data
Clairemont Center
N=381
79.53 %
View Historical Data
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Colby-Abbotsford Center
N=955
81.15 %
View Historical Data
Cornell Center
N=290
57.24 %
View Historical Data
Cumberland Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eagle River Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eau Claire Center
N=3096
72.58 %
View Historical Data
Eau Claire South Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Elk Mound Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Greenwood Center
N=271
77.49 %
View Historical Data
Hayward Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Ladysmith Center
N=895
80.00 %
View Historical Data
Lake Hallie Center
N=1177
73.58 %
View Historical Data
Lakewoods Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Center
N=8596
87.65 %
View Historical Data
MARSHFIELD CLINIC
N=43657
78.62 %
View Historical Data
Marshfield Clinic at Howard Young Medical

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic at James Beck Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care at St Michaels

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Menomonie Center
N=590
79.49 %
View Historical Data
Mercer Center
N=106
68.87 %
View Historical Data
Merrill Center
N=1802
79.74 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Center
N=2470
81.98 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Counseling Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Mosinee Center
N=566
69.96 %
View Historical Data
Oakwood Center
N=1854
83.39 %
View Historical Data
Osseo Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Park Falls Center
N=1082
70.52 %
View Historical Data
Phillips Center
N=461
69.41 %
View Historical Data
Professional Plaza

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Regional Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Rice Lake Center
N=4847
76.36 %
View Historical Data
Riverview Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Stettin Center
N=2172
82.64 %
View Historical Data
Stevens Point Center
N=492
74.39 %
View Historical Data
Stratford Center
N=654
92.05 %
View Historical Data
Wausau Center
N=1732
80.14 %
View Historical Data
Wausau Oral Surgery

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Weston Center
N=1618
87.70 %
View Historical Data
Weston Oral Surgery Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wisconsin Rapids Center
N=824
75.36 %
View Historical Data
Wisconsin Rapids Orthopedics Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wittenberg Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Woodruff Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

There is good evidence that cervical cancer screening significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. The US Preventive Services Task Force suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening at age 21. Recommendations include screening for women ages 21 through 64 with cytology (Pap smear) at least every 3 years and for women ages 30 through 64 who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. An individuals specific clinical considerations, risk factors, etc. determine if testing is needed at a more frequent interval. It is recommended that women speak with their health care providers to determine the appropriate interval for their particular situation. There is limited evidence to determine the benefits of continued screening in women older than 65, due to declining incidence of high-grade cervical lesions after middle age. There is fair evidence that screening women older than 65 is associated with an increased risk for potential harm (US Preventive Services Task Force). Therefore, it is also recommended that women over age 65 speak with their health care providers to determine if continued screening is appropriate for their personal medical condition.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.