Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 66 Clinics in the UW Health health system


The results below represent 60,916 women who should have had one or more cervical cancer screening tests during the previous 36 months or one cervical cancer screening test and a human papillomavirus test within the last 5 years. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ACHC ERDMAN FAM MED
N=1321
74.94 %
View Historical Data
ACHC SOUTHSIDE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA FAMILY MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH FAM MED CENTER
N=1829
77.58 %
View Historical Data
ACHC WTE MEDICAL
N=1110
74.05 %
View Historical Data
AUGUSTA FAM MED
N=273
50.55 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM FAM MED
N=1634
69.03 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM INT MED
N=382
70.94 %
View Historical Data
BELLEVILLE FAM MED
N=1339
82.00 %
View Historical Data
COLUMBUS FAM MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COTTAGE GROVE MAIN FAM MED
N=889
78.29 %
View Historical Data
CROSS PLAINS FAM MED
N=1140
80.79 %
View Historical Data
DEFOREST WINDSOR FAM MED
N=3251
81.82 %
View Historical Data
DEPARTMENT_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC INT MED
N=2548
76.92 %
View Historical Data
EAST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAU CLAIRE FAM MED
N=700
45.86 %
View Historical Data
EMPLOYER SERVICES DEFOREST SCHOOL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG FAM MED
N=1542
83.98 %
View Historical Data
FITCHBURG PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FORT ATKINSON MEHTA FAM MED
N=1271
65.85 %
View Historical Data
MERITER MATERNAL FETAL MED PSYCHOLOGY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MOUNT HOREB FAM MED
N=1192
74.75 %
View Historical Data
NORTHEAST FAM MED
N=2560
80.98 %
View Historical Data
OAKWOOD WEST GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ODANA ATRIUM FAM MED
N=3958
85.35 %
View Historical Data
ODANA ATRIUM INT MED
N=580
83.10 %
View Historical Data
OLD_COTTAGE GROVE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_FORT ATKINSON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OREGON FAM MED
N=1229
77.87 %
View Historical Data
PORTAGE FAM MED
N=715
74.41 %
View Historical Data
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM FAM MED
N=1581
77.55 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD INT MED
N=573
79.93 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUN PRAIRIE WINDSOR FAM MED
N=3186
80.10 %
View Historical Data
TAC PEDS FITNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 4TH FLOOR
N=1242
81.72 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 5TH FLOOR
N=2335
86.68 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WELCOME CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WOMANCARE GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS INT MED
N=2112
83.29 %
UNION CORNERS OB GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION INT MED
N=2408
76.87 %
View Historical Data
UNIV STATION PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION PEDS ADOLESCENT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VERONA FAM MED
N=3092
81.73 %
View Historical Data
Wchq_Metric_id

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED AB
N=1951
81.80 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD
N=2005
83.99 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED WMNS HEALTH
N=4337
86.88 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST TOWNE INT MED
N=2405
83.87 %
View Historical Data
WEST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
YAHARA FAM MED
N=4226
83.58 %
View Historical Data

There is good evidence that cervical cancer screening significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. The US Preventive Services Task Force suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening at age 21. Recommendations include screening for women ages 21 through 64 with cytology (Pap smear) at least every 3 years and for women ages 30 through 64 who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. An individuals specific clinical considerations, risk factors, etc. determine if testing is needed at a more frequent interval. It is recommended that women speak with their health care providers to determine the appropriate interval for their particular situation. There is limited evidence to determine the benefits of continued screening in women older than 65, due to declining incidence of high-grade cervical lesions after middle age. There is fair evidence that screening women older than 65 is associated with an increased risk for potential harm (US Preventive Services Task Force). Therefore, it is also recommended that women over age 65 speak with their health care providers to determine if continued screening is appropriate for their personal medical condition.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.