Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 147 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 139,953 women who should have had one or more cervical cancer screening tests during the previous 36 months or one cervical cancer screening test and a human papillomavirus test within the last 5 years. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=2959
85.91 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=3193
84.53 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=2247
84.91 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=770
80.52 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=1304
80.83 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=5490
89.29 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=2766
85.57 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=1184
87.08 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=4745
84.68 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=4794
84.25 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=3128
89.16 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=3568
82.43 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=2214
85.73 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=649
78.27 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=1340
86.57 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD
N=657
83.71 %
View Historical Data
AAH - SLINGER
N=892
84.30 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=2191
88.00 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=1152
88.54 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=2368
88.68 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=1833
83.36 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=1984
87.85 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=1622
84.77 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH
N=1106
94.67 %
View Historical Data
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=843
87.31 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=1048
83.40 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=803
83.06 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=2121
86.47 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=3006
83.80 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE
N=1571
86.95 %
View Historical Data
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=6343
87.14 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET
N=1129
89.02 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=3283
86.96 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH
N=1240
90.48 %
View Historical Data
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC
N=357
90.48 %
View Historical Data
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO
N=692
89.02 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=3406
85.53 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=3263
85.11 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO
N=308
85.71 %
View Historical Data
AHC SUAMICO
N=1044
88.12 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=1310
80.23 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB
N=177
94.35 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=807
85.25 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=1401
86.44 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=2037
85.71 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=1275
76.63 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY
N=515
79.42 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=2553
89.19 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=1734
87.43 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=1825
86.36 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=1654
87.00 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=2171
79.92 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=2048
85.94 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=656
85.98 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=3317
84.93 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH
N=582
85.91 %
View Historical Data
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=3930
85.39 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC
N=227
86.34 %
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=946
81.29 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=675
92.59 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES
N=956
87.97 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=2462
86.60 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY
N=555
81.80 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=1163
86.93 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT
N=525
85.71 %
View Historical Data
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=3820
84.19 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC
N=721
82.52 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=4428
85.50 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=1964
83.86 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER
N=600
89.00 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=2358
85.75 %
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY CARE CENTER
N=1193
88.68 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=1388
79.90 %
View Historical Data
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=1596
82.33 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN
N=346
84.39 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE LAYTON
N=457
89.50 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK
N=381
89.24 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=587
83.48 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

There is good evidence that cervical cancer screening significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. The US Preventive Services Task Force suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening at age 21. Recommendations include screening for women ages 21 through 64 with cytology (Pap smear) at least every 3 years and for women ages 30 through 64 who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. An individuals specific clinical considerations, risk factors, etc. determine if testing is needed at a more frequent interval. It is recommended that women speak with their health care providers to determine the appropriate interval for their particular situation. There is limited evidence to determine the benefits of continued screening in women older than 65, due to declining incidence of high-grade cervical lesions after middle age. There is fair evidence that screening women older than 65 is associated with an increased risk for potential harm (US Preventive Services Task Force). Therefore, it is also recommended that women over age 65 speak with their health care providers to determine if continued screening is appropriate for their personal medical condition.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.