Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 38 Clinics in the Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin health system


The results below represent 38,360 women who should have had one or more cervical cancer screening tests during the previous 36 months or one cervical cancer screening test and a human papillomavirus test within the last 5 years. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
CITY OF MILWAUKEE WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FH - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CALHOUN HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CENTRAL WAUKESHA HEALTH CLINIC
N=140
49.29 %
FMCW - COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - FROEDTERT HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Germantown Health Center
N=2642
86.90 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Greendale Health Center
N=357
61.34 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Greenfield Highlands Health Center
N=2190
84.61 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Hartford Health Center
N=1098
78.23 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Internal Medicine - Froedtert Specialty Clinics Building
N=1971
77.22 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Jackson Health Center
N=2184
83.75 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Kewaskum Health Center
N=1044
77.78 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Lincoln Avenue Health Center
N=2259
80.74 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Moorland Reserve Health Center
N=1444
86.43 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - North Hills Health Center
N=1638
85.71 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Oconomowoc Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Plank Road Health Center
N=3364
81.54 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Sargeant Health Center
N=2739
84.37 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Springdale Health Center
N=1970
88.93 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - St Joseph Health Center
N=364
96.15 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - St. Joseph's Hospital

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Sunnyslope Health Center
N=3184
89.92 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Sussex Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Town Hall Health Center
N=3132
84.42 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - West Bend Health Center
N=5161
81.84 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Westbrook Health Center
N=1479
87.22 %
View Historical Data
HATCO WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MCW - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC CMH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC FEC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC SJH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PALERMO'S WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

There is good evidence that cervical cancer screening significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. The US Preventive Services Task Force suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening at age 21. Recommendations include screening for women ages 21 through 64 with cytology (Pap smear) at least every 3 years and for women ages 30 through 64 who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. An individuals specific clinical considerations, risk factors, etc. determine if testing is needed at a more frequent interval. It is recommended that women speak with their health care providers to determine the appropriate interval for their particular situation. There is limited evidence to determine the benefits of continued screening in women older than 65, due to declining incidence of high-grade cervical lesions after middle age. There is fair evidence that screening women older than 65 is associated with an increased risk for potential harm (US Preventive Services Task Force). Therefore, it is also recommended that women over age 65 speak with their health care providers to determine if continued screening is appropriate for their personal medical condition.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.