Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 147 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 199,431 men and women who should have had a colorectal cancer screening. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=2616
78.90 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=4660
77.10 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=3139
81.40 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=2113
77.95 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=2004
73.80 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=9261
83.19 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=4051
81.41 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=1993
79.63 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=6990
80.17 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=7570
76.95 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=1743
82.33 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=6009
81.00 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=2438
75.02 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=1578
79.40 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=2182
79.88 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD
N=532
80.64 %
View Historical Data
AAH - SLINGER
N=1649
81.99 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=3199
80.84 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=1384
78.83 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=2639
80.37 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=1892
79.02 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=3499
83.88 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=3162
85.80 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH
N=101
88.12 %
View Historical Data
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=1400
83.57 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=1885
76.60 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=1315
77.87 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=3140
84.49 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=3379
80.53 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE
N=1318
81.11 %
View Historical Data
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=7866
81.21 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET
N=1668
82.07 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=5026
79.13 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH
N=1309
84.26 %
View Historical Data
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC
N=336
75.00 %
View Historical Data
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO
N=649
80.59 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=4099
81.85 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=4973
79.03 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO
N=743
71.47 %
View Historical Data
AHC SUAMICO
N=1564
82.42 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=2636
80.50 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=2259
83.18 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=1851
80.88 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=3339
84.13 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=2327
74.39 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY
N=1502
76.76 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=2028
81.90 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=3370
83.74 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=1611
80.26 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=3144
85.15 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=4417
81.71 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=3988
83.15 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=1274
82.65 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=4890
80.39 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH
N=656
75.91 %
View Historical Data
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=7224
85.42 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=1536
77.99 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=1182
86.46 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES
N=1347
80.18 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=2782
80.63 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY
N=861
72.94 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=1378
78.52 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT
N=758
81.27 %
View Historical Data
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=6726
80.39 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC
N=459
83.66 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=5510
82.21 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=3419
84.35 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER
N=570
80.35 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=3956
79.55 %
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY
N=208
77.40 %
View Historical Data
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
N=253
76.28 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY CARE CENTER
N=809
79.23 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=1450
72.90 %
View Historical Data
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=1861
78.29 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=776
75.39 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women, at age 50 and older for colorectal cancer. The optimal interval for screening depends on the test. Annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunoassay Test (FIT) offers greater reductions in mortality rates than biennial screening. A 10-year interval has been recommended for colonoscopy, but a 5-year interval is recommended for flexible sigmoidoscopies because of their lower sensitivity. Fecal DNA Screening (Cologuard test) has been added as a new option for screening in 2015 (recommended interval every three years). The USPSTF concluded that the benefits from screening for colorectal cancer substantially outweigh potential harms, and that regardless of screening strategy chosen, it is likely to be cost-effective. In persons identified as being at high-risk by their health care providers, initiating screening at an earlier age is reasonable. It is recommended that all adults speak with their health care providers to determine, on an individual basis, the age at which to begin and end screenings, the best type of screening for individual circumstances, and the frequency of these screenings.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.