Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 38 Clinics in the Froedtert & The Medical College of Wisconsin health system


The results below represent 50,385 men and women who should have had a colorectal cancer screening. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
CITY OF MILWAUKEE WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FASTCARE SUSSEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FH - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CALHOUN HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - CENTRAL WAUKESHA HEALTH CLINIC
N=255
74.90 %
FMCW - COMMUNITY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - FROEDTERT HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Germantown Health Center
N=3077
83.72 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Greendale Health Center
N=846
73.05 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Greenfield Highlands Health Center
N=1391
84.04 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Hartford Health Center
N=1320
77.12 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Internal Medicine - Froedtert Specialty Clinics Building
N=3632
83.26 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Jackson Health Center
N=2532
79.42 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Kewaskum Health Center
N=1771
76.45 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Lincoln Avenue Health Center
N=2807
80.90 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Moorland Reserve Health Center
N=1516
89.38 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - North Hills Health Center
N=1639
81.57 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Oconomowoc Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Plank Road Health Center
N=3851
82.73 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Sargeant Health Center
N=5371
87.08 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Springdale Health Center
N=1935
87.49 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - St Joseph Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - ST JOSEPHS HOSPITAL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - St. Joseph's Hospital

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Sunnyslope Health Center
N=2171
86.14 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Sussex Health Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FMCW - Town Hall Health Center
N=6151
83.68 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - West Bend Health Center
N=8698
82.08 %
View Historical Data
FMCW - Westbrook Health Center
N=1422
83.26 %
View Historical Data
HATCO WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MCW - CANCER CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC CMH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC FEC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC SJH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NP CLINIC WP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PALERMO'S WORKPLACE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women, at age 50 and older for colorectal cancer. The optimal interval for screening depends on the test. Annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunoassay Test (FIT) offers greater reductions in mortality rates than biennial screening. A 10-year interval has been recommended for colonoscopy, but a 5-year interval is recommended for flexible sigmoidoscopies because of their lower sensitivity. Fecal DNA Screening (Cologuard test) has been added as a new option for screening in 2015 (recommended interval every three years). The USPSTF concluded that the benefits from screening for colorectal cancer substantially outweigh potential harms, and that regardless of screening strategy chosen, it is likely to be cost-effective. In persons identified as being at high-risk by their health care providers, initiating screening at an earlier age is reasonable. It is recommended that all adults speak with their health care providers to determine, on an individual basis, the age at which to begin and end screenings, the best type of screening for individual circumstances, and the frequency of these screenings.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.