Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 65 Clinics in the Ascension | Wheaton Franciscan Healthcare health system


The results below represent 12,725 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AS 1320 WI AVE FL 1 N

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AS Gateway-Kenosha

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MP Rawson 120
N=205
54.63 %
Oak Creek
N=193
68.91 %
SF OHIO 209

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SJ FL5 Women Outpatient Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG 1244 WI AVE 300

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG 1320 WI AVE FL 1 N
N=705
59.01 %
View Historical Data
WFMG 2500 LAYTON 220

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS 3807 FAM
N=985
65.08 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS 3807 INT
N=1616
81.56 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS 3807 PED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS CVI 410

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS ENDO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS MT PLEASANT
N=696
71.12 %
View Historical Data
WFMG AS POB A 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS RACINE INSINKERATOR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS SLHP FL1

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS Sturtevant

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG AS W POB B 240

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL
N=597
74.54 %
View Historical Data
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL PSY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG BROOKFIELD CAPITOL WWOOD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG BROWN DEER
N=881
71.85 %
View Historical Data
WFMG CUDAHY
N=286
63.29 %
View Historical Data
WFMG EM MOB 400

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 104W

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG EMAC 200E
N=540
53.89 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FOUR MILE
N=782
76.85 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FRK MOB FL 2
N=826
65.86 %
View Historical Data
WFMG FRK MOB FL 3

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG GLENDALE OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG METRO MAP 114

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2500 LAYTON 10

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 201

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 2745 LAYTON 206

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP 4600 LOOMIS 130
N=578
67.30 %
View Historical Data
WFMG MP CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP NEW BERLIN 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP RAWSON G30

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP S 16TH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 100
N=522
70.50 %
View Historical Data
WFMG MP SF MAP 122

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF MAP 124

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG MP SF OHIO 103

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG NEW BERLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG ONE MAIN
N=430
74.65 %
View Historical Data
WFMG ORCHARD ST

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG PEWAUKEE
N=151
67.55 %
View Historical Data
WFMG RAWSON 143

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG RAWSON G30
N=387
66.15 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SF EUCLID 1000
N=326
69.94 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SF MAP 102 CRDEP

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SF MAP 105 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ FL 7W
N=171
55.56 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SJ POB 106

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ POB 210

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG SJ POB FL 6
N=382
73.30 %
View Historical Data
WFMG SUSSEX
N=334
72.16 %
View Historical Data
WFMG TOSA FL 2
N=902
73.84 %
View Historical Data
WFMG TOSA FL 2 CRD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA FL 3 OBG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG TOSA N 117TH 200

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WFMG UNION GROVE
N=230
59.57 %
View Historical Data

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Process measure contains three goals. All goals within the measure must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure.

Diabetes optimal testing includes:

  • Two A1C tests performed during the 12 month reporting period -- And
  • One kidney function test during the 12 month reporting period, and/or diagnosis and treatment of kidney disease -- And
  • One estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) test annually

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the provider.

For the Patient: The American Diabetes Association recommends these three tests to prevent and reduce diabetes complications such as blindness, loss of limb and kidney disease. All tests should be performed and the test results will help your doctor decide the best diabetes care for you. The All-or-None measure can be used to see how well diabetes care is done where you receive your care.

For the Provider: This method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patients entire healthcare experience. In addition, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.