Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Diabetes: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 32 Clinics in the ThedaCare health system


The results below represent 9,009 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has five goals. All five goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - MIDWAY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - NEENAH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - NEW LONDON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - OSHKOSH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - SHAWANO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - TCA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH - WAUPACA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS - ENDOCRINOLOGY NEENAH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS BLACK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS CLINTONVILLE
N=299
44.48 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS DARBOY
N=431
44.32 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS HILBERT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS INTERNAL MEDICINE - KNAUS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS INTERNAL MEDICINE APPLETON
N=773
52.52 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS INTERNAL MEDICINE NEENAH
N=386
38.60 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS IOLA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS KIMBERLY
N=326
53.99 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS MANAWA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS MENASHA
N=688
49.85 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS NEENAH
N=1219
45.28 %
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS NEW LONDON
N=898
47.88 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS NORTH
N=1121
49.78 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS OSHKOSH
N=472
44.49 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS APPLETON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS PEDIATRICS NEENAH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS SENIOR CARE SPECIALISTS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS SHAWANO
N=1094
43.78 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS TIGERTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS WAUPACA
N=1051
47.95 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS WEST
N=251
45.42 %
View Historical Data
THEDACARE PHYSICIANS WEYAUWEGA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Measures are two separate measures, one for process (optimal testing) and one for outcomes (optimal results). This measure contains five goals. All five goals within the measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator of each all-or-none measure is collected from the organization's total diabetes denominator.

Using the diabetes denominator optimal results includes:

  • Most recent A1C test result is less than 8.0% -- And
  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Tobacco Non-User -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet for Diabetes Patients with Ischemic Vascular Disease Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use for patients ages 40 through 75 or patients with IVD of any age

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.

Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.