Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Diabetes: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 72 Clinics in the UW Health health system


The results below represent 12,825 patients with Diabetes.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the diabetes measure and has five goals. All five goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ACHC ERDMAN FAM MED
N=361
19.67 %
View Historical Data
ACHC SOUTHSIDE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA FAMILY MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH FAM MED CENTER
N=534
32.40 %
View Historical Data
ACHC WTE MEDICAL
N=277
23.10 %
View Historical Data
AUGUSTA FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
BEAVER DAM FAM MED
N=546
47.44 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM INT MED
N=306
47.39 %
View Historical Data
BELLEVILLE FAM MED
N=263
42.97 %
View Historical Data
COLUMBUS FAM MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COTTAGE GROVE MAIN FAM MED
N=187
40.64 %
View Historical Data
CROSS PLAINS FAM MED
N=225
45.78 %
View Historical Data
DEFOREST WINDSOR FAM MED
N=597
46.73 %
View Historical Data
DEPARTMENT_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC INT MED
N=662
46.37 %
View Historical Data
EAST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAU CLAIRE FAM MED
N=113
27.43 %
View Historical Data
EMPLOYER SERVICES DEFOREST SCHOOL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG FAM MED
N=162
42.59 %
View Historical Data
FITCHBURG PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FORT ATKINSON MEHTA FAM MED
N=499
50.70 %
View Historical Data
MERITER MATERNAL FETAL MED PSYCHOLOGY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MOUNT HOREB FAM MED
N=182
45.60 %
View Historical Data
NORTHEAST FAM MED
N=640
37.50 %
View Historical Data
OAKWOOD WEST GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ODANA ATRIUM FAM MED
N=665
45.86 %
View Historical Data
ODANA ATRIUM INT MED
N=183
41.53 %
View Historical Data
OLD_COTTAGE GROVE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_FORT ATKINSON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OREGON FAM MED
N=295
44.75 %
View Historical Data
PORTAGE FAM MED
N=325
40.62 %
View Historical Data
S PARK FISH ARB CENTERING PREG MIDWIVES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG OB/GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM FAM MED
N=178
39.89 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD INT MED
N=166
53.01 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUB ZERO EMPLOYER HEALTH SERVICES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUN PRAIRIE WINDSOR FAM MED
N=603
40.80 %
View Historical Data
TAC PEDS FITNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 4TH FLOOR
N=440
46.82 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 5TH FLOOR
N=363
44.90 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WELCOME CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WOMANCARE GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS INT MED
N=610
45.08 %
View Historical Data
UNION CORNERS OB GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION INT MED
N=449
47.22 %
View Historical Data
UNIV STATION PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION PEDS ADOLESCENT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VERONA FAM MED
N=484
46.28 %
View Historical Data
Wchq_Metric_id

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED AB
N=604
46.69 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD
N=458
49.78 %
WEST CLINIC INT MED WMNS HEALTH
N=327
44.34 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST TOWNE INT MED
N=477
54.72 %
View Historical Data
WEST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
YAHARA FAM MED
N=644
46.27 %
View Historical Data

Diabetes All-or-None Measures

The Diabetes All-or-None Measures are two separate measures, one for process (optimal testing) and one for outcomes (optimal results). This measure contains five goals. All five goals within the measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator of each all-or-none measure is collected from the organization's total diabetes denominator.

Using the diabetes denominator optimal results includes:

  • Most recent A1C test result is less than 8.0% -- And
  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Tobacco Non-User -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet for Diabetes Patients with Ischemic Vascular Disease Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use for patients ages 40 through 75 or patients with IVD of any age

Why use an All-or-None method?
This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.

Nolan T, Berwick DM. All-or-none measurement raises the bar on performance. JAMA. 2006 Mar 8;295(10):1168-70.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.