Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 51 Clinics in the Marshfield Clinic health system


The results below represent 14,546 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
322

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Arcadia Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Athens Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Bloomer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Cadott Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Chetek Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Chippewa Falls Center
N=244
63.11 %
View Historical Data
Clairemont Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Colby-Abbotsford Center
N=167
60.48 %
View Historical Data
Cornell Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Cumberland Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eagle River Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Eau Claire Center
N=359
63.23 %
View Historical Data
Eau Claire South Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Elk Mound Center (Inactive)

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Greenwood Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Hayward Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Ladysmith Center
N=254
50.39 %
View Historical Data
Lake Hallie Center
N=183
66.67 %
View Historical Data
Lakewoods Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Center
N=1614
65.37 %
View Historical Data
MARSHFIELD CLINIC
N=7814
63.08 %
View Historical Data
Marshfield Clinic at Howard Young Medical

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic at James Beck Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Marshfield Clinic Cancer Care at St Michaels

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Menomonie Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Mercer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Merrill Center
N=375
68.00 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Center
N=838
65.39 %
View Historical Data
Minocqua Counseling Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Mosinee Center
N=192
50.52 %
View Historical Data
Oakwood Center
N=152
63.82 %
View Historical Data
Osseo Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Park Falls Center
N=279
56.99 %
View Historical Data
Phillips Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Professional Plaza

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Regional Cancer Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Rice Lake Center
N=833
64.83 %
View Historical Data
Riverview Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Stettin Center
N=240
68.75 %
View Historical Data
Stevens Point Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Stratford Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wausau Center
N=289
70.24 %
View Historical Data
Wausau Oral Surgery

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Weston Center
N=448
65.85 %
View Historical Data
Weston Oral Surgery Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wisconsin Rapids Center
N=265
55.09 %
View Historical Data
Wisconsin Rapids Orthopedics Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Wittenberg Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Woodruff Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.