Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 149 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 17,113 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=130
69.23 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=310
65.48 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=179
68.72 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=279
66.67 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=147
68.03 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=627
68.74 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=460
61.09 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=126
69.84 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=443
67.72 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=657
65.45 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=171
64.33 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=367
69.21 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=159
62.89 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=121
67.77 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=212
69.34 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - SLINGER
N=221
65.61 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=315
64.44 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST MEQUON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=148
72.30 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABAHC CRIVITZ

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=263
62.36 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=283
68.90 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=139
64.75 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=144
62.50 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=142
69.72 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=269
72.49 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=413
70.94 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=783
62.07 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=596
67.45 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=321
64.49 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=428
62.62 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SUAMICO
N=140
62.86 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=267
79.78 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=369
70.19 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=113
67.26 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=345
72.75 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=192
71.35 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=179
65.36 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=359
69.64 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=157
71.34 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=397
70.03 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH
N=154
74.03 %
View Historical Data
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=734
64.44 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=512
72.85 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=149
63.76 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE
N=106
73.58 %
View Historical Data
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=427
65.57 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=700
66.00 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=261
67.43 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=370
57.57 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=133
57.14 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=614
66.12 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=511
67.91 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=244
70.08 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=394
64.72 %
View Historical Data
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=158
62.66 %
View Historical Data
FRANKLIN WOMEN'S CLINIC STE 120

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=155
42.58 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=120
61.67 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.