Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page

Ischemic Vascular Disease: All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control)  This is a measure developed by the Wisconsin Collaborative for Healthcare Quality (WCHQ).

Your Search Results: 26 Clinics in the Aspirus health system


The results below represent 3,009 patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease.

The All-Or-None method is a more complete way of reporting the IVD measure and has multiple goals. All goals must be reached by each patient in order to meet the measure. For more information about how this method is different from reporting individual measures please click: Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ASPIRUS ANTIGO CLINIC
N=476
78.36 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS DOCTORS CLINIC
N=562
72.78 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS GILMAN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS KRONENWETTER CLINIC
N=169
79.29 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS LAND O LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-BIRNAMWOOD CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS LANGLADE HOSPITAL-ELCHO CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS MEDFORD CLINIC
N=337
64.99 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS PEDIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PHILLIPS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS PRENTICE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS RHINELANDER CLINIC
N=160
73.75 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS RIB LAKE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS THREE LAKES CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL EDGAR CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY HEALTH SPECIALISTS
N=260
73.46 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL FAMILY PHYSICIANS
N=245
75.51 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MARATHON CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL MERRILL CLINIC
N=139
77.70 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL STEVENS POINT CLINIC
N=193
68.91 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WAUSAU HOSPITAL WESTHILL MEDICAL SPECIALISTS
N=316
80.70 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WESTON CLINIC
N=152
73.68 %
View Historical Data
ASPIRUS WITTENBERG CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASPIRUS WOODRUFF CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Test Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance


The IVD All-or-None Measure is one outcome measure (optimal control). The measure contains four goals. All four goals within a measure must be reached in order to meet that measure. The numerator for the all-or-none measure should be collected from the organization's total IVD denominator.

All-or-None Outcome Measure (Optimal Control) - Using the IVD denominator optimal results include:

  • Most recent blood pressure measurement is less than 140/90 mm Hg -- And
  • Most recent tobacco status is Tobacco Free -- And
  • Daily Aspirin or Other Antiplatelet Unless Contraindicated -- And
  • Statin Use

Why use an All-or-None method?

This method was chosen because of the benefits it provides to both the patient and the practitioner. First, this methodology more closely reflects the interests and likely desires of the patient. With the data collected in two scores (optimal testing and optimal results), patients can easily look and see how their provider group is performing on these criteria rather than trying to make sense of multiple scores on individual measures. Second, this method represents a systems perspective emphasizing the importance of optimal care through a patient's entire healthcare experience. Third, this method gives a more sensitive scale for improvement. For those organizations scoring high marks on individual measures, the All-or-None measure will give room for benchmarks and additional improvements to be made.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.