Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 149 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 144,300 women who should have had one or more cervical cancer screening tests during the previous 36 months or one cervical cancer screening test and a human papillomavirus test within the last 5 years. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=3059
85.88 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=3025
84.07 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=2284
86.78 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=783
77.39 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=1298
78.89 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=5615
89.35 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=2918
85.20 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=1157
85.48 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=4568
84.33 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=4822
82.70 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=3262
89.15 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=3807
82.66 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=2284
86.95 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=590
79.66 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=1473
88.19 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD
N=688
83.14 %
View Historical Data
AAH - SLINGER
N=894
83.78 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=2226
86.48 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=1077
88.02 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=2448
89.42 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=1738
81.88 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABAHC CRIVITZ

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=1862
86.79 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=1692
82.57 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH
N=1074
93.20 %
View Historical Data
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=835
86.23 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=1008
85.71 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=847
84.30 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=2002
85.66 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=3087
82.67 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE
N=1524
85.70 %
View Historical Data
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=6599
85.85 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET
N=1148
89.11 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=3355
85.75 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH
N=1448
89.57 %
View Historical Data
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO
N=729
88.75 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=3289
84.37 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=3457
83.86 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO
N=341
86.22 %
View Historical Data
AHC SUAMICO
N=1051
87.06 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=1297
79.80 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB
N=186
93.55 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=819
85.96 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=1400
86.43 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=2220
84.41 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=1246
75.76 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY
N=573
80.80 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=2636
88.13 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=1736
86.58 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=1772
86.40 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=1755
84.79 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH
N=1038
82.37 %
View Historical Data
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=2175
78.90 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=1994
86.86 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=717
82.15 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE
N=887
87.82 %
View Historical Data
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=2934
85.65 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS
N=871
85.88 %
View Historical Data
ASC SOUTH
N=721
85.85 %
View Historical Data
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=3924
84.63 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC
N=285
83.51 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE
N=1681
88.40 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=1090
82.11 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=555
93.15 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES
N=980
87.14 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=2604
85.98 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=1194
88.36 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT
N=592
85.47 %
View Historical Data
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=3696
84.01 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC
N=708
81.78 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=4651
84.35 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=2055
84.96 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER
N=632
88.45 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=2442
84.85 %
View Historical Data
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY CARE CENTER
N=1131
87.36 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=1197
76.94 %
View Historical Data
FRANKLIN WOMEN'S CLINIC STE 120

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=1486
83.18 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN
N=387
82.43 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=669
80.12 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

There is good evidence that cervical cancer screening significantly reduces the incidence of and mortality from cervical cancer. The US Preventive Services Task Force suggests most of the benefit can be obtained by beginning screening at age 21. Recommendations include screening for women ages 21 through 64 with cytology (Pap smear) at least every 3 years and for women ages 30 through 64 who want to lengthen the screening interval, screening with a combination of cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) testing every 5 years. An individuals specific clinical considerations, risk factors, etc. determine if testing is needed at a more frequent interval. It is recommended that women speak with their health care providers to determine the appropriate interval for their particular situation. There is limited evidence to determine the benefits of continued screening in women older than 65, due to declining incidence of high-grade cervical lesions after middle age. There is fair evidence that screening women older than 65 is associated with an increased risk for potential harm (US Preventive Services Task Force). Therefore, it is also recommended that women over age 65 speak with their health care providers to determine if continued screening is appropriate for their personal medical condition.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.