Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 31 Clinics in the Gundersen Health System health system


The results below represent 41,322 men and women who should have had a colorectal cancer screening. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
Ashley Wellness Center
N=634
66.88 %
View Historical Data
GNP Health and Wellness Center

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Calmar Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Decorah Clinic
N=2733
78.16 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Galesville Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Harmony Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Houston Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - La Crescent Clinic
N=1514
85.87 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - La Crosse Clinic
N=13144
85.62 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Lansing Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Onalaska Clinic
N=10697
84.84 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Ossian Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen - Prairie du Chien Clinic
N=1729
75.19 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Sparta Clinic
N=1846
80.17 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Spring Grove
N=255
71.76 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Tomah Clinic
N=1598
77.10 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Viroqua Clinic
N=1739
72.46 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen - Waukon Clinic
N=793
81.72 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen Boscobel Area - Boscobel Clinic
N=1165
40.43 %
View Historical Data
Gundersen Boscobel Area - Fennimore Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
Gundersen Boscobel Area - Muscoda Clinic

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PLH Family Med Fayette

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PLH Family Med Postville
N=275
63.64 %
View Historical Data
PLH Family Med West Union
N=1428
72.97 %
View Historical Data
Riverside Corporate Wellness

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STJ Family Med Elroy

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STJ Family Med Hillsboro
N=874
56.98 %
View Historical Data
STJ Family Med Wonewoc

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TCM Family Med Blair

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TCM Family Med Independence

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TCM Family Med Whitehall
N=898
67.59 %
View Historical Data

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women, at age 50 and older for colorectal cancer. The optimal interval for screening depends on the test. Annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunoassay Test (FIT) offers greater reductions in mortality rates than biennial screening. A 10-year interval has been recommended for colonoscopy, but a 5-year interval is recommended for flexible sigmoidoscopies because of their lower sensitivity. Fecal DNA Screening (Cologuard test) has been added as a new option for screening in 2015 (recommended interval every three years). The USPSTF concluded that the benefits from screening for colorectal cancer substantially outweigh potential harms, and that regardless of screening strategy chosen, it is likely to be cost-effective. In persons identified as being at high-risk by their health care providers, initiating screening at an earlier age is reasonable. It is recommended that all adults speak with their health care providers to determine, on an individual basis, the age at which to begin and end screenings, the best type of screening for individual circumstances, and the frequency of these screenings.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.