Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 72 Clinics in the UW Health health system


The results below represent 72,652 men and women who should have had a colorectal cancer screening. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
ACHC ERDMAN FAM MED
N=862
55.34 %
View Historical Data
ACHC SOUTHSIDE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA FAMILY MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ACHC WINGRA PARK FISH FAM MED CENTER
N=1753
68.51 %
View Historical Data
ACHC WTE MEDICAL
N=715
47.97 %
View Historical Data
AUGUSTA FAM MED
N=421
48.69 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM FAM MED
N=2566
71.36 %
View Historical Data
BEAVER DAM INT MED
N=1243
76.19 %
View Historical Data
BELLEVILLE FAM MED
N=1668
75.66 %
View Historical Data
COLUMBUS FAM MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS FAM MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COLUMBUS INT MED_OLD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
COTTAGE GROVE MAIN FAM MED
N=1076
80.02 %
View Historical Data
CROSS PLAINS FAM MED
N=1462
78.66 %
View Historical Data
DEFOREST WINDSOR FAM MED
N=3788
81.60 %
View Historical Data
DEPARTMENT_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST CLINIC INT MED
N=3090
83.75 %
View Historical Data
EAST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE INT MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
EAU CLAIRE FAM MED
N=593
50.76 %
View Historical Data
EMPLOYER SERVICES DEFOREST SCHOOL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FITCHBURG FAM MED
N=962
77.55 %
View Historical Data
FITCHBURG PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FORT ATKINSON MEHTA FAM MED
N=2142
72.32 %
View Historical Data
MERITER MATERNAL FETAL MED PSYCHOLOGY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MOUNT HOREB FAM MED
N=1268
80.05 %
View Historical Data
NORTHEAST FAM MED
N=2676
75.30 %
View Historical Data
OAKWOOD WEST GERIATRICS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ODANA ATRIUM FAM MED
N=4252
83.96 %
View Historical Data
ODANA ATRIUM INT MED
N=825
79.39 %
View Historical Data
OLD_COTTAGE GROVE FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OLD_FORT ATKINSON FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
OREGON FAM MED
N=1757
79.74 %
View Historical Data
PORTAGE FAM MED
N=1430
72.45 %
View Historical Data
S PARK FISH ARB CENTERING PREG MIDWIVES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM CENTERING PREG OB/GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
S PARK FISH ARBORETUM FAM MED
N=1296
76.31 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD FAM MED

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
STOUGHTON NYGAARD INT MED
N=888
79.84 %
View Historical Data
STOUGHTON NYGAARD PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUB ZERO EMPLOYER HEALTH SERVICES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
SUN PRAIRIE WINDSOR FAM MED
N=3153
76.72 %
View Historical Data
TAC PEDS FITNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 4TH FLOOR
N=3056
88.84 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK INT MED 5TH FLOOR
N=2377
89.27 %
View Historical Data
TWENTY S PARK MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WELCOME CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
TWENTY S PARK WOMANCARE GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS INT MED
N=2942
80.86 %
View Historical Data
UNION CORNERS OB GYN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNION CORNERS PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION GERIATRICS
N=332
56.02 %
View Historical Data
UNIV STATION INT MED
N=3127
85.29 %
View Historical Data
UNIV STATION PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
UNIV STATION PEDS ADOLESCENT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VERONA FAM MED
N=3163
76.92 %
View Historical Data
Wchq_Metric_id

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED AB
N=3888
85.37 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC INT MED CD
N=2991
86.02 %
WEST CLINIC INT MED WMNS HEALTH
N=3320
86.42 %
View Historical Data
WEST CLINIC MIDWIVES OB GYN-NEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST CLINIC PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST TOWNE INT MED
N=3244
87.64 %
View Historical Data
WEST TOWNE PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
YAHARA FAM MED
N=4326
80.26 %
View Historical Data

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women, at age 50 and older for colorectal cancer. The optimal interval for screening depends on the test. Annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunoassay Test (FIT) offers greater reductions in mortality rates than biennial screening. A 10-year interval has been recommended for colonoscopy, but a 5-year interval is recommended for flexible sigmoidoscopies because of their lower sensitivity. Fecal DNA Screening (Cologuard test) has been added as a new option for screening in 2015 (recommended interval every three years). The USPSTF concluded that the benefits from screening for colorectal cancer substantially outweigh potential harms, and that regardless of screening strategy chosen, it is likely to be cost-effective. In persons identified as being at high-risk by their health care providers, initiating screening at an earlier age is reasonable. It is recommended that all adults speak with their health care providers to determine, on an individual basis, the age at which to begin and end screenings, the best type of screening for individual circumstances, and the frequency of these screenings.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.