Wisconsin Collaborative for Quality Healthcare

View Our Reports

print this page
Your Search Results: 149 Clinics in the Aurora Health Care health system


The results below represent 207,843 men and women who should have had a colorectal cancer screening. Read More About This Measure

Reporting Period:

Sort By Rank | Sort By Name  
Btn Export
AAH - BAY VIEW

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - BROOKFIELD BLUEMOUND
N=2687
78.27 %
View Historical Data
AAH - CEDAR CREEK
N=4379
77.53 %
View Historical Data
AAH - EAST MEQUON
N=3242
82.02 %
View Historical Data
AAH - FRANKLIN
N=2146
78.24 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GERMANTOWN
N=2046
75.95 %
View Historical Data
AAH - GOOD HOPE ROAD
N=9435
83.62 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HARTFORD
N=4249
81.12 %
View Historical Data
AAH - HIGH POINTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - HUBERTUS
N=2017
79.33 %
View Historical Data
AAH - JACKSON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - KEWASKUM

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MAYFAIR ROAD
N=6935
80.74 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MAYVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - MENOMONEE FALLS
N=7582
77.10 %
View Historical Data
AAH - MILWAUKEE WEST
N=2281
82.03 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NEW BERLIN
N=6235
81.32 %
View Historical Data
AAH - NORTHWEST
N=2391
76.33 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON
N=1475
77.76 %
View Historical Data
AAH - PORT WASHINGTON EAST
N=2291
80.27 %
View Historical Data
AAH - RIDGEFIELD
N=551
79.31 %
View Historical Data
AAH - SLINGER
N=1716
80.94 %
View Historical Data
AAH - ST LUKES HEALTH SCIENCES BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AAH - WEST BEND
N=3278
79.80 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST BEND SOUTH
N=1274
81.16 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WEST MEQUON
N=2701
81.86 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WHITEFISH BAY
N=1959
79.12 %
View Historical Data
AAH - WOMENS CARE CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABAHC CRIVITZ

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABHC
N=3263
82.75 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - 1ST FLOOR POB
N=3297
85.62 %
View Historical Data
ABMC - PEDS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ABMC - WOMENS HEALTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC AT VILLAGE MANOR PARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC BAY SETTLEMENT
N=1464
83.54 %
View Historical Data
AHC BONDUEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC CALEDONIA
N=1869
79.99 %
View Historical Data
AHC DELAVAN
N=1344
78.42 %
View Historical Data
AHC DENMARK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC DEPERE
N=3246
85.43 %
View Historical Data
AHC EDGERTON
N=3508
79.50 %
View Historical Data
AHC FOX LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC FREMONT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC GRAND AVENUE
N=1353
81.89 %
View Historical Data
AHC GREENVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC HALES CORNERS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KAUKAUNA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC KENOSHA
N=8288
81.01 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA 35TH STREET
N=1722
83.57 %
View Historical Data
AHC KENOSHA NORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC LAKE GENEVA
N=5173
80.03 %
View Historical Data
AHC LOMIRA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC MISHICOT

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC NEENAH
N=1545
84.08 %
View Historical Data
AHC NORTH FOND DU LAC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OCONTO

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC OMRO
N=703
79.52 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH - FAMILY MEDICINE
N=4037
82.81 %
View Historical Data
AHC OSHKOSH WESTOWNE II

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC PULASKI

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RACINE
N=5182
79.80 %
View Historical Data
AHC REEDSVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC RIPON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SEYMOUR

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC SHAWANO
N=781
73.88 %
View Historical Data
AHC SUAMICO
N=1637
81.19 %
View Historical Data
AHC TOWER COURT
N=2656
82.27 %
View Historical Data
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC TWO RIVERS MOB - IM
N=2275
82.24 %
View Historical Data
AHC UNION GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC US BANK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WATERFORD CLINIC
N=1886
79.90 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUKESHA
N=3619
82.70 %
View Historical Data
AHC WAUTOMA

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC WINNECONNE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AHC ZION
N=2301
74.14 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOOR COUNTY
N=1478
78.35 %
View Historical Data
AMG DOWNTOWN
N=2123
82.43 %
View Historical Data
AMG FOND DU LAC
N=3413
83.56 %
View Historical Data
AMG FRANKLIN SUITE 116
N=1643
80.22 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH
N=3261
84.58 %
View Historical Data
AMG OSHKOSH NORTH
N=1840
85.05 %
View Historical Data
AMG PRIMARY CARE SUITE 135
N=4486
81.34 %
View Historical Data
AMG TWO RIVERS
N=4009
84.56 %
View Historical Data
AMG VASCULAR CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AMG WILLOWS
N=1324
80.97 %
View Historical Data
ASC CEDAR GROVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC HOWARDS GROVE
N=1484
86.39 %
View Historical Data
ASC KIEL

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC PLYMOUTH
N=4432
81.66 %
View Historical Data
ASC RANDOM LAKE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SHEBOYGAN FALLS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASC SOUTH
N=795
72.83 %
View Historical Data
ASMC MIDWIFERY CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
ASMC WOMENS HEALTH CENTER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA BURLINGTON CLINIC
N=7300
85.25 %
View Historical Data
AURORA FAMILY MEDICINE ABMC
N=605
82.31 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - 22ND AVENUE
N=2327
78.26 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - ELKHORN
N=1659
79.20 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - PADDOCK LAKE
N=854
84.43 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - TWIN LAKES
N=1391
79.94 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WALWORTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER - WEST ALLIS
N=2895
78.62 %
View Historical Data
AURORA HEALTH CENTER EAST TROY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA HEALTH CENTER MARINETTE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA LAKELAND FAMILY MEDICINE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA MANITOWOC SOUTH
N=1423
78.43 %
View Historical Data
AURORA MIDTOWN HEALTH CT
N=811
77.68 %
View Historical Data
AURORA SHEBOYGAN CLINIC
N=6703
81.35 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WALKERS POINT COMMUNITY CLINIC
N=472
84.11 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WEST ALLIS WOMENS PAVILION STE 515

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC
N=5795
81.54 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DELAFIELD

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - DOUSMAN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - HARTLAND
N=3523
84.56 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WILKINSON CLINIC - WALES

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AURORA WISELIVES CENTER
N=546
78.21 %
View Historical Data
AURORA WOMENS HEALTH AND WELLNESS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
AWAMC POT, STE 200
N=4027
80.31 %
View Historical Data
CENTER FOR SENIOR HEALTH AND LONGEVITY
N=236
75.42 %
View Historical Data
CLINIC_NAME

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FACULTY PHYSICIANS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
N=273
79.85 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY CARE CENTER
N=799
77.85 %
View Historical Data
FAMILY MEDICAL CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
FAMILY PRACTICE CENTER
N=1256
72.29 %
View Historical Data
FRANKLIN WOMEN'S CLINIC STE 120

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
GERMANTOWN SOUTH

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
INTERNAL MEDICINE CLINIC
N=1793
80.59 %
View Historical Data
INTERNAL MEDICINE ST LUKES POB SUITE 135

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE CUDAHY

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE FRANKLIN

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE LAYTON

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO JANESVILLE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE MUSKEGO MOORLAND

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OAK CREEK

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE OHIO BLDG

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - CHICAGO AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTH MILWAUKEE - MILWAUKEE AVE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE SOUTHPOINTE
N=848
75.00 %
View Historical Data
LAKESHORE THIRD WARD ANNEX

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WEST ALLIS

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
LAKESHORE WOMENS PAVILION

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
MARINETTE MENOMINEE PEDIATRIC CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
NEW HOLSTEIN CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
PESHTIGO FAMILY PRACTICE

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
VALDERS CLINIC

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance
WEST ALLIS PHYSICIAN OFFICE TOWER

The number of patients or providers is too small for
purposes of reliably reporting performance

The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) strongly recommends that clinicians screen men and women, at age 50 and older for colorectal cancer. The optimal interval for screening depends on the test. Annual fecal occult blood testing (FOBT)/Fecal Immunoassay Test (FIT) offers greater reductions in mortality rates than biennial screening. A 10-year interval has been recommended for colonoscopy, but a 5-year interval is recommended for flexible sigmoidoscopies because of their lower sensitivity. Fecal DNA Screening (Cologuard test) has been added as a new option for screening in 2015 (recommended interval every three years). The USPSTF concluded that the benefits from screening for colorectal cancer substantially outweigh potential harms, and that regardless of screening strategy chosen, it is likely to be cost-effective. In persons identified as being at high-risk by their health care providers, initiating screening at an earlier age is reasonable. It is recommended that all adults speak with their health care providers to determine, on an individual basis, the age at which to begin and end screenings, the best type of screening for individual circumstances, and the frequency of these screenings.


Disclaimer: Measures reported by WCHQ healthcare organizations represent a specific aspect of care in relation to an evidence-based standard, but are not clinical guidelines and do not establish standards of care.